Business Times journalist Sivanithy wrote an article(yesterday) on SGX’s initiative
 to consult the public on HFT trading in the SGX. The introduction of 
the HFT is now a matter of when, so what is this public consultation all
 about? Should not the SGX try to educate the public on what this HFT is
 all about, the pros and cons of this newcomer? 
 
Sivanithy asked a few very basic and pertinent questions. What is HFT 
and the need for SGX to educate the public on this new animal that it 
assumed everyone knows what it is but the truth is that no one knows. It
 is not as simple as what people think, that HFT is there to provide 
liquidity in the market to benefit the other traders.
 
Without knowing how this animal works, what kind of advantage it has 
over the rest of the players, no one knows how dangerous or what harm it
 can cause to the market. One thing for sure, HFT is not here to do 
charity. Its mission is simply to take advantage of any arbitrage 
situation to take profits. Technically, it can only make profits and not
 losses. So, how is this going to benefit the other players? How can the
 exchange allow HFT or any other instruments to enter the market with a 
clear cut advantage, to make profits while other players lose? 
 
This applies to Algorithm trading. The Algo players have the advantage 
of their super computers to compute and take positions to make profits. 
It is like a sure bet. And who are the losers or the sure losers? The 
exchange should have enough data by now on who are the big net gainers 
from the market. Both Algo traders and HFT traders are more or less 
guaranteed to profit from the system with the aid of high tech 
equipment. This is a violation of the exchange’s guiding principle and 
responsibility of providing a level playing view. 
 
What is the SGX and MAS’s positions on this? Is it fair to the rest of 
the traders? Are they breaking their own rules and regulations?
 
There is a need to tell the whole story on the capabilities of the HFT 
and Algo trading technology? Don’t just tell the people how good they 
are. The public and the govt need to know how harmful they are. The 
public were told how good the Lehman Bonds and toxic notes were but 
nothing about how bad they could turn out.  We need to learn from that 
mistake and handle this new animal with great care. 
 
What information is made available to them and not to the other traders 
and how they can take advantage of the information to make assured 
profit?  If the technology can assure them of profits, how can they be 
allowed to do so when other traders enter the market with the risk of 
losing instead of making profits? How can SGX/MAS allow HFT and Algo 
traders to play in the market when they can only be winners and paying a
 small clearing fee? Is this the case?
 
The public and other traders have the right to know what they are up 
against. There is a need for transparency and disclosure on what these 
two systems can do and are doing. How many Algo computers are already 
hooked onto the SGX computers and how many HFT computers will be allowed
 into the system?
 
It is the responsibility of MAS and SGX to provide a level playing field
 and fair play. Period. The public cannot be let into a market 
blindfolded without knowing how dangerous these new players are and what
 they are up against, and with their hands tied.
 
No comments:
Post a Comment